🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the UK, and it seems it’s time for a reassessment. Over the years, an celebration that started out as a celebration and reminder of the past, cultural identity and bonds between Black populations worldwide, has taken on a business-like atmosphere, growing to encompass gatherings where Black people are remunerated to speak with predominantly white listeners about hidden biases and supportive partnership. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade created a surge in the enterprise of displaying cultural sensitivity. Yet, that phase is now over. The surge has reached its height, producing a diluted aftermath of what raising awareness is for.

The Origins of Black History Observance

Originally observed in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was created in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of celebration and reflection in the middle of February. Black History Month grew out of this movement and was formally inaugurated in 1970. Currently it is marked not only in the United States and Canada in the second month, but also in autumn in the United Kingdom, Germany, Éire and the Netherlands.

The month has transformed since that time, focusing less on the narratives of the slave trade across the Atlantic and civil rights battles, and increasingly on influential individuals of color in government, the arts, and social movements, and broadly celebrating the contribution Black people have made to shape the country. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with talks and cultural events. But the way the month is observed is a indication of the contemporary political context. How it evolves is a valuable example in how appropriation leads to erosion: the reshaping of Black History Month has impeded the point of it, which is to tackle structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Jarring Moment

Few things illustrate how critical it is to rethink Black History Month more than the particular moment in which it occurs this year. In the UK, a resurgent right in the guise of the Reform organization is ahead in surveys. In the warmer months we witnessed the largest far-right rally in British history. Kemi Badenoch, the Black leader of the right-wing political group, is a strong critic of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a situation where a member of parliament feels emboldened to state that the absence of Caucasian individuals in certain urban areas is a cause for alarm. At the same time, far-right parties are surging in the EU as a entirety.

In the US, a massive attack against DEI and affirmative action has been brought, often successfully, to the top legal institutions of the nation. A effort to scrub Black history and narrative from the historical documents is ongoing. One of the political figure's early administrative commands aimed at the museum of African American legacy, and the Smithsonian Institution, claiming they of a “concerted and widespread effort to alter the country's historical narrative” by portraying America “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

Against this backdrop, the celebration symbolises how minimally it can be influential if it is limited to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or depoliticized festivities of historical achievements, rather than addressing the situation of the present. It also shows how its restricted time span means that it is separated from the broader ongoing work that is required. An academic expert, a prof at a learning establishment, articulated it most accurately when she expressed apprehension about the short-term symbolic gestures of the month. “The difficulty with taking a tokenistic approach”, she wrote, “is that it often means that Black History Month becomes a transient display rather than a agent of progress.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Establishing how to adapt, revise and extend initiatives for fair treatment and appreciation in such moments of dejection and worry is a difficult task. There is a temptation to just do away with things like Black History Month altogether, assuming they are no longer suitable, or are relics of an era that has been ineffective.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and heritage of campaigns for equality – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, DEI programs, and certainly, even commercial engagements – constitute an framework that a considerable labor has been invested in. It is there not just to decay as the situation evolves (and in fact, regresses), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a fresh vibrant Black History Month look like? Firstly, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is spread out across all seasons (as some institutions are already beginning to do), sections of its curriculum (particularly around historic Black characters) included in school curriculums. It would also be a period that does not shy away from governmental matters, and allows opportunity for people, particularly youth, to express their concerns and stories. What value has mere awareness of the history when it fails to address the present reality of far-right rallies in the public spaces? Organizations who celebrate it should not be reassured with the non-confrontational words of “unconscious bias” and alertness to subtle slights, but faced with the risks that impact society if anti-racism is not treated with importance. To summarize, Black History Month should be made current, urgent, and adaptive. Maybe an complete renaming is necessary – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.